Ending factory farming. Ending animal cruelty.
Search icon

Laying Hen Behavior, Welfare Issues, and Commercial Housing Systems

In the United States, commercial laying hens will lay approximately 300 eggs in one year 1​. Hens are complex animals and perform highly -motivated natural behaviors, such as scratching and pecking the ground in search of food or grit, dustbathing to remove excess oils or harmful mites, flapping and stretching their wings, and perching on structures above ground level for improved surveillance and protection from predators. Laying hens live in a social hierarchy, or pecking order, organized from dominant to more docile hens in the flock ​6​. Like all species, laying hens will become frustrated or bored when their ability to express their natural behaviors is restricted or denied. This causes the hens to experience stress, frustration, boredom, and poor welfare from stress.

With or without enrichments, all cages are highly restrictive, and the space and resources needed for hens to express natural behaviors are rarely available, if at all ​4​.

Commercial housing systems: cages

Cage confinement is regarded as one of the cruellest factory farming practices. There are two types of cages in which egg-laying hens are typically kept.

Hens in battery cage showing signs of distress and feather loss.

There are two main types of cages that are used across the United States and Canada, both causing poor welfare outcomes and immense suffering for birds:

Battery cages

Battery cage illustraion demonstrating restricted space and feeding area.

In the 1960’s, battery cages (also called conventional housing) became the predominant housing system for commercial egg production to both maintain low cost and increase efficiency, ​​9​ ​but this came at a cost for the hens. Battery cages are fully enclosed in wire mesh and often barren with only a nipple drinker and feeding tray. One battery cage can be used to house laying hens of up to 10 birds. In a battery cage, the average space allowance per bird is approximately 67 square inches (sq. in.), slightly less than a letter-size sheet of paper ​10​​.

White hens packed into cages set in rows inside a factory.

Nearly all welfare issues for hens result from a life spent in a battery cage. Due to the wire mesh base, hens cannot perform basic actions like dustbathing – a natural behavior that helps remove excess oils or parasites and cleans the hens’ feathers. Laying hens may still attempt to dustbathe on the wire floors of the cages, known as sham dustbathing ​​11​​. However, the wire flooring can cause serious damage to the hens, resulting in feather damage or loss.

In the United States, considerable progress has been made to move approximately 40% of U.S. laying hens into cage-free housing environments. The U.S. cage-free laying hen flock continues to increase despite supply chain and production barriers. However, progress is still needed before battery cages are fully removed from U.S. commercial egg production.

Enriched cages

Illustration showing space and feeding areas in an enriched cage.

Enriched cages (also called furnished or colony cages) are an alternative housing system to battery cages that provide only marginal improvements to the welfare of laying hens. Unlike battery cages, enriched cages provide more space, perching bars, nesting areas, and a solid pad with some substrate for dustbathing and scratching. However, the limited three-dimensional space and lackluster, insufficient enrichment means the laying hens’ natural behaviors are still restricted in enriched cages, causing the hens stress, frustration, boredom, and poor welfare.

White hens in an enriched cage standing on a perch.

Research suggests that a laying hen requires a minimum of 184 in2 to dust bathe and 440 in2 to flap their wings freely ​12​, much larger than the average 116in2 space per hen allotted in enriched cages. A plastic mat with substrates is installed where a small amount of feed is regularly provided to encourage the hens to dustbathe. However, the amount of substrate is limited to mitigate high dust levels in the air. In addition, each plastic dustbathing mat provides only 1.5 – 5.2 sq. in. per hen ​13​. Crammed laying hens may peck, interrupt, or injure other hens in the flock who are attempting to perform this socially motivated behavior simultaneously ​4​. Due to the lack of appropriate space and enrichment, sham-dustbathing still takes place on the wire flooring in enriched cage systems, causing the hens feather damage or loss.

Descended from red jungle fowl, laying hens naturally seek perches high up from the ground to rest at night to avoid predation. However, the lack of vertical space in enriched cages and the placement of perching bars inhibits and discourages this behavior as hens are forced to crouch while perching ​12​. Even the simple act of turning around is restricted for laying hens due to the limited space and high stocking density in enriched cages ​14​.

White hen in an enriched cage displaying a perching.

Enriched cages are not as common as battery cages in the United States but are predominately used in Canada. While the total number is unknown, surveyed egg producers projected that less than 1% of these systems will be utilized in the U.S. by 2025 ​15​. However, they are rapidly becoming the new housing standard in Canada, accounting for nearly 34% of all production systems for laying hens ​5​. Despite over 75% of surveyed Canadian consumers disapproving of enriched cage housing ​16​, enriched cages continue to increase during the transition away from battery cages. Truly cage-free growth in the Canadian market continues to stall, with all cage-free systems (i.e., aviary/free run,1 free range,2 organic3) accounting for only ~18% of total laying hen production systems in Canada ​5.

Position Paper

Additional information can be found on CIWF’s position note for enriched cages.

Download PDF Position Paper
Position Paper

Cage-free systems for egg-laying hens

Illustration of a free-range system for egg laying hens.

The term “cage-free” is still not legally defined by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). For improved transparency, companies have adopted meaningful animal welfare-focused third-party certifications, such as Certified Humane, the Global Animal Partnership (G.A.P.) and Animal Welfare Approved by A Greener World. Learn more about third-party certifications in our certification matrix below.

Hens living in cage-free environments have improved housing and welfare standards compared to their caged counterparts. In cage-free systems, laying hens can move freely and engage in natural behaviors like stretching, flying, scratching, pecking, and dustbathing ​(CIWF, n.d.-b)​. Instead of stacks of cages, hens have multi-level aviaries that have open tiers and separate nesting, feeding, and perching areas. This system allows the hens more freedom, space, and appropriate resources for greater behavioral expression. Cage-free systems vary in space allowance, but they average 144 sq. in. per hen, which is more than double the space provided for each hen in battery cages (67 sq. in., or roughly the size of a standard iPad).

Free-range indoor egg laying hen system.

Free-range and pasture-raised systems go beyond indoor cage-free systems by including outdoor access for hens, potentially enriching the quality of the space for the hens to roam. Free-range and pasture-raised standards do not guarantee a minimum amount of time or space available outdoors, so CIWF encourages the use of reliable third-party certifications to assure hens are provided quality time outdoors. Learn more about these certifications.

Male Chick Culling

In the global poultry sector, chickens are bred and reared specifically for either high egg or high meat production, creating different breeds with different characteristics. Male chicks from breeds raised for producing eggs are deemed unsuitable for meat production due to their slow growth rate and low breast meat yield and are therefore culled. When the next generation of egg-laying hens hatch, the chicks are sorted by gender. The female chicks are then raised to lay their own eggs, while the newly hatched male chicks are typically placed on a conveyor belt and ground up alive in a macerator.

Chicks in a crate on a conveyer belt
When chicks hatch, they are sorted by gender and the males are killed by maceration while the females live to lay more eggs.

7.9 billion hens are needed to lay eggs for the global market, resulting in over 7 billion one-day-old male chicks being killed each year by the commercial egg industry. In the US alone, over 350 million day-old male chicks are immediately killed by the extremely painful and barbaric practice of maceration. Countries like Germany, France, and the Netherlands, have passed laws banning the practice of male chick culling in response to public outrage.

Brittle Bones

Modern commercial hens have been bred to produce large numbers of eggs. This depletes the hen’s store of calcium and can result in high levels of osteoporosis (brittle bones) and fractures. Restricted movement can also contribute to osteoporosis.

A better way

Higher-welfare methods of egg production allow hens a better quality of life.

​​1. USDA NASS - Chickens and Eggs 2023 Summary. (2024)

2. USDA: Economic Research Service using data from USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service.

3. Statistics Canada: Table: 32-10-0119-01 Production and disposition of eggs, annual. (2024)

4. Platz, S., Heyn, E., Hergt, F., Weigl, B., Erhard, M.: Comparative study on the behaviour, health and productivity of laying hens in a furnished cage and an aviary system. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 122, 235–40 (2009)

​5. Egg Farmers of Canada: 2023 Annual Report. (2023)

6. Weeks, C., Nicol, C.: Behavioural needs, priorities and preferences of laying hens. Worlds Poult Sci J. 62, 296–307 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200598

7. van Staaveren, N., Harlander, A.: Cause and prevention of injurious pecking in chickens. Presented at the November (2020)

8. Glatz, P., Underwood, G.: Current methods and techniques of beak trimming laying hens, welfare issues and alternative approaches. Anim Prod Sci. 61, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19673

9. United Egg Producers: Evolution of U.S. Egg Farming, https://unitedegg.com/about/evolution-of-u-s-egg-farming/

​10. CIWF: Welfare Issues For Laying Hens, https://www.ciwf.com/farmed-animals/chickens/egg-laying-hens/welfare-issues/

11. Rodenburg, B., Tuyttens, F., Reu, K., Herman, L., Zoons, J., Sonck, B.: Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: An on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare 17 (2008) 4. 17, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S096272860002786X

12. Riddle, E.R., Ali, A.B.A., Campbell, D.L.M., Siegford, J.M.: Space use by 4 strains of laying hens to perch, wing flap, dust bathe, stand and lie down. PLoS One. 13, e0190532 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190532

13. Sandilands, V., Baker, L., Donbavand, J., Brocklehurst, S.: Effects of Different Scratch Mat Designs on Hen Behaviour and Eggs Laid in Enriched Cages. Animals (Basel). 11, (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061544

​14. Mench, J.A., Blatchford, R.A.: Determination of space use by laying hens using kinematic analysis. Poult Sci. 93, 794–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03549

15. O’Keefe, T.: 2021 survey: Cage-free conversions slowing down, https://www.wattagnet.com/egg/egg-production/article/15532604/2021-survey-cage-free-conversions-fewer-total-hens

16. Bryant Research: Canadians Support An End to Cage Confinement for Egg-Laying Hens, https://bryantresearch.co.uk/insight-items/end-cage-confinement/

17. CIWF: Higher Welfare Alternatives for Hens, https://www.ciwf.com/farmed-animals/chickens/egg-laying-hens/higher-welfare/

18. Daedal Research: The US Shell Eggs Market: Analysis By Production, By Consumption, By Type (Caged, Free Range & Cage Free and Pasture Raised), By Distribution Channel (Retail, Breaker, Institution and Export), Size and Trends with Impact of COVID-19 and Forecast up to 2028. (2023)

19. Danovich, T.: Why the US egg industry is still killing 300 million chicks a year, https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22374193/eggs-chickens-animal-welfare-culling

20. Cultivate Insights: Consumer Attitudes and Interest Regarding In-Ovo Egg Sexing. (2023)

21. InnovateAnimalAg: In-Ovo Sexing, https://www.innovateanimalag.org/egg-sexing#:~:text=In%2Dovo%20sexing%20is%20an,of%20day%2Dold%20male%20chicks.

22. Bjørnstad, S., Austdal, L.P.E., Roald, B., Glover, J.C., Paulsen, R.E.: Cracking the Egg: Potential of the Developing Chicken as a Model System for Nonclinical Safety Studies of Pharmaceuticals. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 355, 386–96 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.115.227025

23. Zimmerman, S.: Agtech seedlings: First US egg producer adopts technology to avoid killing male chicks, https://www.agriculturedive.com/news/agtech-eggs-in-ovo-sexing-aquabounty-closes-gene-edited-salmon-syngenta-weed-control-enko/735532/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Issue:%202024-12-13%20Agriculture%20Dive%20%5Bissue:68772%5D&utm_term=Agriculture%20Dive

​24. Innovate Animal Ag: Agri Advanced Technologies Announces they are Supplying Two In-Ovo Sexing Systems to US, https://www.innovateanimalag.org/blog/breaking-agri-advanced-technologies-announces-they-are-supplying-two-in-ovo-sexing-system-to-us

25. David, L.: First U.S. Egg Producer Commits to End Chick Culling by Fall, https://sentientmedia.org/first-us-egg-producer-end-chick-culling/

26. Caputo, V., Lusk, J., Tonsor, G., Staples, A.: The Transition to Cage-Free Eggs. (2023)

27. NFACC . (2017)

28. Hodges, L., Todd, J.: WIC Program, https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/wic-program/

29. CIWF: Cage-Free and WIC, https://www.ciwf.com/public-policy/cage-free-and-wic/

30. USC Dornsife: Psychology of the Grocery Store, https://appliedpsychologydegree.usc.edu/blog/psychology-of-the-grocery-store

Globe

You are using an outdated browser which we do not support. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.